Would you ....

Dating & Relationship chat

Would you ....

Postby swan » 31 Aug 2010, 17:46

Would you .....

1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?

2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.

3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.

4. Or snog well.

5. Would you get fed up with bad technique and dump them or try to teach them.

6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off.
Bollox.
User avatar
swan
 
Posts: 5153
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 20:17
Location: Deepest Darkest Sussex.

Re: Would you ....

Postby Storm » 31 Aug 2010, 17:55

1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?

NO..GOD! NO!!! (I think you know ;))
2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.

YES..I would teach them

3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.

Wanna play a game?

4. Or snog well.

If the kiss was cold, it does not matter what the willy is like, it will never warm you back up!

5. Would you get fed up with bad technique and dump them or try to teach them.

We still talking about kissing?... Big thing for me this.. the rest I can teach.
6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off

No sex? no me!.. crap at kissing.. bye bye!
Want to learn?.. step this way :drool:
Storm
 

Re: Would you ....

Postby Teenwolf » 31 Aug 2010, 18:02

1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?


Not a chance in hell.

2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.


Very unlikely.

3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.


Very unlikely.

4. Or snog well.


Snog???

5. Would you get fed up with bad technique and dump them or try to teach them.


I would break it off.

6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off.


Bugger off.
User avatar
Teenwolf
 
Posts: 203
Joined: 18 Jun 2010, 13:25
Location: Halifax, NS

Re: Would you ....

Postby swan » 31 Aug 2010, 18:05

Teenwolf wrote:
Snog???




Kiss. Well, kiss alot, necking, snogging. Hmm. Maybe it's a Brit word. :? :D
Bollox.
User avatar
swan
 
Posts: 5153
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 20:17
Location: Deepest Darkest Sussex.

Re: Would you ....

Postby ibakecakes » 31 Aug 2010, 19:59

While I am all up for swapping roles and sometimes being teacher and sometimes the naughty schoolgirl, I wouldnt want to be the teacher ALL the time...................sometimes you just need shagging senseless over the sink/back of the sofa etc by a real man who knows how to give it to you properly......so therefore being with someone who hardly knew what to do with it would not satisfy me for long. And to kiss properly is something that really turns me on so that would be a definate one for me
Her Royal Highness, The Queen of Cake, Mistress of All Things Bodacious, Purveyor of Unearthly Delights, and Supreme Forum Dominatrix.
User avatar
ibakecakes
 
Posts: 3044
Joined: 08 Nov 2009, 21:49
Location: Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory

Re: Would you ....

Postby dotcom » 31 Aug 2010, 20:14

They would have to have more money than God & I would have to be really financially strapped to answer yes to any of those comments. Not likely that will ever happen. I'm a nasty horny beotch, I need sex, good sex, lots of sex, or I can get real ugly! But don't tell anyone because they may get the wrong idea. :shhh:
dotcom
 

Re: Would you ....

Postby *Manny* » 31 Aug 2010, 20:15

swan wrote:1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?


Yes, but not exclusive...I would start with a friendship where we could get to the point of being comfortable enough to discuss sexual issues openly.

swan wrote:2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.


if they were bad at it, then it could be discussed in hopes of making the adjustments that would improve things. No oral at all? I would not enter into an exclusive relationship with them.

swan wrote:3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.


that would be a deal breaker! That would really turn out to be sad. If I wanted a room mate, I'd advertise for one. :lol:

swan wrote:4. Or snog well.


also teachable and improvable.

swan wrote:6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off.


I can't change other people, but I would hope that they are able to change themselves at their own pace....no demands. If I still liked that person, I would hope to keep the friendship.
REALLY?? Get a Life!!
User avatar
*Manny*
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: 28 Apr 2010, 19:58
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Re: Would you ....

Postby Teenwolf » 31 Aug 2010, 22:05

swan wrote:
Teenwolf wrote:
Snog???




Kiss. Well, kiss alot, necking, snogging. Hmm. Maybe it's a Brit word. :? :D


I'm sure it is a Brit word!

Being with a bad kisser? No, I'll pass on that one too.
User avatar
Teenwolf
 
Posts: 203
Joined: 18 Jun 2010, 13:25
Location: Halifax, NS

Re: Would you ....

Postby lally » 31 Aug 2010, 22:52

swan wrote:Would you .....

1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?
Of course..but it would just be a friendship.

2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.
No.

3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.
No

4. Or snog well.
No

5. Would you get fed up with bad technique and dump them or try to teach them.
Yes, I would dump.

6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off.

if there was no sensitivity at the offset, I wouldn't want to repeat it.
"POFU: like pof but with sillier rules"
lally
 
Posts: 897
Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 16:38

Re: Would you ....

Postby verityone » 01 Sep 2010, 00:29

swan wrote:Would you .....

1.Have a relationship with someone who said no sex before marriage or could not have sex for a personal reason?

I've never been with a woman who didn't want to get nekkid after more than 2 or 3 dates, ever in my life.

swan wrote:2. Have a rel with someone who did not do oral or who was really awful at it.

Not a chance. Not even is she was supermodel beautiful, and was born rich.

swan wrote:3. Or give decent hand jobs, or indeed any foreplay whatsoever.

Not a chance. Not even is she was supermodel beautiful, and was born rich.

swan wrote:4. Or snog well.

Not a chance. Not even is she was supermodel beautiful, and was born rich.

swan wrote:5. Would you get fed up with bad technique and dump them or try to teach them.

Dump them.

If she's lousy, she's unaware that she is, and actually thinks she's good.
There's no way to tell a woman that she sucks in bed, and hope that her ego will ever recover.
swan wrote:6. Or would you put up with all of the above in the hope that they'd change their minds/techniques, and how long would you put up with it until you got fed up and buggered off.

Not a chance. Not even is she was supermodel beautiful, and was born rich.


And the answer is, yes. I'll put up with a lot of less than desirable qualities (except physical attraction) if she's awesome in bed.

I can get all the other things I want, in other areas, and people in my life.
Like POF but without silly rules....... Let's see, shall we?

The trouble with trouble is, it usually starts out as fun...
verityone
 
Posts: 718
Joined: 22 Apr 2010, 06:39

Next

Return to Sex, Dating & Relationships