POFUsers.com - Plenty of Fish Users Forum

Storm wrote:

Humphrey Osmond wrote:As of 2 minutes ago/There are 15 registered users and 5 hidden users online, 23 guest users online:

I'm going to track by time/users.

I am trying to find that phrase that is Freudian.. It just escapes me at the moment

Projection much?

No ..An observation

Storm wrote:No ..An observation

Same here.

Ah! Two observers being a tiny bit paranoid with the illusion of projection..What would the final diagnosis be I wonder?

Storm wrote:Ah! Two observers being a tiny bit paranoid with the illusion of projection..

No paranoia here, ...just completely lost as to what could have possibly been Freudian.

Storm wrote:What would the final diagnosis be I wonder?

Don't ask me, ...I still haven't figured out what you're getting at (re: Freudian), hence = "projection"

No paranoia here, ...just completely lost as to what could have possibly been Freudian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_retentive

Personally I think we should project in a Jungian modality and then we can all observe the same projection in our collective unconsciousness. That'd be much easier.

Personally I think we should project in a Jungian modality and then we can all observe the same thing in our collective unconsciousness. That'd be much easier.

Sounds like a childish dream to me

Storm wrote:

No paranoia here, ...just completely lost as to what could have possibly been Freudian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_retentive

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_expulsive

There are 15 registered users and 5 hidden users online
There are 21 guest users online