POFUsers.com - Plenty of Fish Users Forum

i have 6 different profiles, 4 of me have already posted on this thread.

i think its good fun

im going to post something really interesting under my other two names now..

I had two profiles from wayyyyyyyy back when, one got banned (don't think they liked me but I don't know why,cos I didn't get the warnings, they say they give).

Dust this off from time to time, countdown to ban number two, is it?

Curiousity killed the Cat wrote:I had two profiles from wayyyyyyyy back when, one got banned (don't think they liked me but I don't know why,cos I didn't get the warnings, they say they give).

Dust this off from time to time, countdown to ban number two, is it?

Stop being a trouble causer.

eddie_hitler wrote:

Curiousity killed the Cat wrote:I had two profiles from wayyyyyyyy back when, one got banned (don't think they liked me but I don't know why,cos I didn't get the warnings, they say they give).

Dust this off from time to time, countdown to ban number two, is it?

Stop being a trouble causer.

I concur.

eddie_hitler wrote:

Curiousity killed the Cat wrote:I had two profiles from wayyyyyyyy back when, one got banned (don't think they liked me but I don't know why,cos I didn't get the warnings, they say they give).

Dust this off from time to time, countdown to ban number two, is it?

Stop being a trouble causer.

WOW thanks for the welcome


What I wrote above was truth, not designed to cause trouble at all. Not sure who you think I am Eddie, and Arnie should know better. But hey ho if I'm not welcome ............

^^^ I happen to thrive on trouble, annoyance, irritations, and complications myself. Welcome!
Meow meow meow said this tigress~ Lets see if you can live up to the rep you seem to already have.

xlr8ingmargo wrote:...thrive on trouble, annoyance, irritations, and complications myself.

Possibly one of the most concise definitions of a "forum troll" I've ever read.

Humphrey Osmond wrote:

xlr8ingmargo wrote:...thrive on trouble, annoyance, irritations, and complications myself.

Possibly one of the most concise definitions of a "forum troll" I've ever read.

You say that like it's a bad thing...surely a certain amount of animosity adds a frisson to actual live debate?

Fingerless Glove wrote:when she used the profile of moonbat to accuse me of having no idea what it is like to be an Irish person and when she called me a windbag even when I was expressing genuine disgust at a rather typically ill thought out post of Saddle_Tramp's - it was a bit too much.

It would be rather difficult for ambien to use "my" profile to accuse you of anything, let alone "having no idea what it is like to be an Irish person" (no such accusation was ever made unless it was constructed in your own noggin).

If you examine any two of our posts you'd find a radically different style of writing, vocabulary, and there's the fact that we come from two different countries...oh yeah, and there's also that bit about ambien being a woman from the USA and me being a man from Canada.

Paranoid delusion much?

and the extreme response by moonbat to my accusation that the profile is fake just serves to emphasise/underline that I am dead right

Extreme? LMAO. Buhbee, you don't know from extreme...plus, you flatter yourself too much. But a certain indignant response level is to be expected. Not only am I thought a figment of someone's imagination, but making arguments I surely have not made...I hate to rise to such obvious bait, but a certain amount of response to quash such base trollery is surely required. Truth to trolls is like salt to slugs IMHO.

Fingerless Glove wrote:

Humphrey Osmond wrote:

xlr8ingmargo wrote:...thrive on trouble, annoyance, irritations, and complications myself.

Possibly one of the most concise definitions of a "forum troll" I've ever read.

You say that like it's a bad thing...

I suppose that's relative to how much one values; " trouble, annoyance, irritations...", doesn't it?

Fingerless Glove wrote:surely a certain amount of animosity adds a frisson to actual live debate?

When there is no debate, or discursive content whatsoever, and a post's content and purpose amount to nothing more than; "Look at me! Look at me!", this isn't frisson, ...it's just irrelevant and vapid pandering, ...or "troll posting"; especially when it is such a consistent pattern of "mostly noise and next to no signal".



See: Signal to Noise Ratio.